Kevin Durant: The Final Case for MVP

April 14th, 2010 by Mike A Leave a reply »
Approximately 55 years ago, the NBA MVP award was created to award the player who was most valuable to his team's success.

Somewhere along the line, we all forgot that.

Anybody with a half a brain could look at the statistical comparison between Kevin Durant and LeBron James, and quickly establish the fact that James is having the better season.

Anybody with a whole brain could look past those statistics, and realize that the Thunder would be lucky to win 20 games in the stacked Western Conference without Kevin Durant.

Durant has taken that team on his back, and they have ridden him all the way to the playoffs.

The same could be said about LeBron and the Cavs, but is that really the case?

Is there really anybody who truly believes that a team made up of Mo Williams, Antawn Jamison, Shaq, Anderson Varejao, and Delonte West isn't good enough to be an Eastern Conference juggernaut?

If the Bucks can cruise into the fifth seed, then they sure as hell can.

Would they be the contender they are now, if not for the King?

Absolutely not.

Would they be better than the Duran ...

Read Full Article at Bleacher Report - NBA
Article written by

Posted in NBA

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 Feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Advertisement

Comments are closed.