Stephen Curry Somehow Made NBA’s Hallowed MVP Award Wholly Inadequate

May 10th, 2016 by Grant Hughes Leave a reply »

Somehow, becoming the first unanimous MVP in NBA history doesn't feel like enough.

Not after Stephen Curry's season punctuated by paradigm-shifting play and more "there's no way that's true" statistical firsts.

I mean, it's nice. It's great. Winning MVP in unprecedented fashion—especially when the voting pool is made up of potentially biased team-affiliated writers and broadcasters—is a big deal. But the MVP is still an award the NBA has handed out 60 times before.

Winning it in a sweep of first-place votes is a necessary way to start appreciating Curry's 2015-16 season, but it's not sufficient.


This was more than a great season. When you wrap all of its parts together, it may have been the most significant single year a player has ever produced.

 

The Incomparable Numbers

You have to start with stats.

I made the case Curry should have been the league's Most Improved Player a handful of times during the year, and at the conclusion of the regular season, there was ample evidence he deserved the hardware.

Consider this, from ESPN.c ...

Read Full Article at Bleacher Report - NBA
Article written by

Advertisement

Comments are closed.