I’ve been hearing a lot of chatter and debate recently, especially on B/R, aimed at Steve Nash’s true value and impact on the Suns since his second stint with the team beginning in 2004.
The discussion topics have ranged from his MVP trophies, to his effect on the Suns, to his defensive ability. I have always fallen on the side of the argument that views Nash as an elite, offensive point guard and a subpar, nearly incapable defender.
Furthermore, I fall on the side of the Nash spectrum that has stated that his lack of defensive prowess and leadership is the primary reason why the Suns have proved unable to reach the NBA Finals.
For all of you Nash lovers and supporters who are going to flood the comments section with complaints and anger, this is not an attempt to knock Steve Nash's accomplishments in any way.
I am solely seeking to shed some light on how Nash is not, nor will he ever be, a complete and all-around point guard.
A few things before I get started:
First, a majority of the statistical analysis and research I have done will not be posted in this article because it would take up a significant a ...
Read Full Article at Bleacher Report - NBA
Article written by Spencer Kier
Steve Nash: The Man, the Myth, the Defensive Liability
November 4th, 2011 by Spencer Kier Leave a reply »
Advertisement